Search Engine Optimization, Reputation Management, & Content Writing Services

Home
Start Here
Services
Internet Marketng
Blog
Marketing, Tech & Fun
Quote
Request a proposal

Archive for the ‘Law & Legality’ Category

Is the Google and Verizon Net Neutrality Agreement All That Neutral?

Friday, August 13th, 2010

Google and Verizon have finally revealed a proposal that, according to Google, will defend net neutrality while also allowing a broadband network of premium services.  Net neutrality is the idea that Internet providers, like Verizon, should not be able to restrict traffic on the web based on the traffic’s content.  The proposal can ultimately change what open Internet is all about, despite Google’s aim for protecting users.

For one, the proposal will allow wireless networks to be exempt from the net neutrality regulation.  They can maintain their own private Internet and allow companies to pay for faster traffic. Second, according to PC World, the proposal “would also create a two-tiered Internet with a net neutral public Internet (the World Wide Web we use today), and a private non-neutral Internet for premium services.”  Many are questioning what will happen to regular Internet as we now know it considering the exemptions.

Opponents of the agreement say that net neutrality will not hold up as long as wireless networks are involved.  Google defends its case with an argument that open Internet for the public is not going to change.  The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) will have the authority to enforce neutrality and intervene when service providers fail to comply with nondiscrimination rules, including any attempts to reduce broadband capacity.  These nondiscirimination rules, however, have yet to be determined.

What you can get with premium services is going to be different than content available on regular Internet.  This includes gaming channels, secure banking, medical services, education services and, of course, entertainment.  The costs for premium services and how they are going to be bundled into packages are still in question.

The ideas laid out in the proposal appear to be problematic according to the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) and “threaten to completely undermine the stated goal of neutrality.”  The EFF has further broken down what they believe are some of the issues with the proposed ideas in the Google and Verizon net neutrality agreement.  The proposal is available for review on both Google’s and Verizon’s public policy blogs.

Another Google Lawsuit – What a Shock!

Wednesday, February 24th, 2010

Three Google executives have been criminally convicted, of breaking privacy laws, in an Italian court.

The decision was about a case of a video, uploaded to and available on YouTube, showing an autistic teenager being bullied.

This guilty verdict is being lauded by some as what Google had coming, and as a dangerous precedent by others. There are vigorous discussions going on in the media and among the webmaster community (see references below), and there are supporters on both sides of the argument.

Those concerned about the chilling effect of this ruling are citing the crippling impact the process of approving every user-generated post will have on the websites that rely on such material. For example, if digg.com was to be forced to approve every submission and comment manually, it might become overwhelming for the organization and eventually result in its demise.

At the same time, YouTube, Digg, and other similar services should not be above the law; however, they should also not be singled out simply because they have deep pockets or are prominent enough to make a good example.

As always, good laws and regulations strike a good balance between providing protection and not stifling business and creativity. With this in mind, the laws should not only target the corporations, hosts, or service providers but also the individuals who use the service and upload material that offends a law. This does not mean that the corporations should not be held responsible, but it also does not mean that they should be forced to manually review and approve every piece of user-generated content that is posted on their site.

Regardless of the different positions being taken about this ruling, it is generating a healthy debate about privacy laws and the responsibility of individuals and corporations when it comes to user-generated content.

Other Sources & Discussions:
http://news.bbc.co.uk/2/hi/technology/8533695.stm
http://www.webmasterworld.com/goog/4086264.htm
http://arstechnica.com/tech-policy/news/2010/02/italian-verdict-on-google-privacy-sets-dangerous-precedent.ars