Search Engine Optimization, Reputation Management, & Content Writing Services

Home
Start Here
Services
Internet Marketng
Blog
Marketing, Tech & Fun
Quote
Request a proposal

Posts Tagged ‘Google’

Is the Google and Verizon Net Neutrality Agreement All That Neutral?

Friday, August 13th, 2010

Google and Verizon have finally revealed a proposal that, according to Google, will defend net neutrality while also allowing a broadband network of premium services.  Net neutrality is the idea that Internet providers, like Verizon, should not be able to restrict traffic on the web based on the traffic’s content.  The proposal can ultimately change what open Internet is all about, despite Google’s aim for protecting users.

For one, the proposal will allow wireless networks to be exempt from the net neutrality regulation.  They can maintain their own private Internet and allow companies to pay for faster traffic. Second, according to PC World, the proposal “would also create a two-tiered Internet with a net neutral public Internet (the World Wide Web we use today), and a private non-neutral Internet for premium services.”  Many are questioning what will happen to regular Internet as we now know it considering the exemptions.

Opponents of the agreement say that net neutrality will not hold up as long as wireless networks are involved.  Google defends its case with an argument that open Internet for the public is not going to change.  The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) will have the authority to enforce neutrality and intervene when service providers fail to comply with nondiscrimination rules, including any attempts to reduce broadband capacity.  These nondiscirimination rules, however, have yet to be determined.

What you can get with premium services is going to be different than content available on regular Internet.  This includes gaming channels, secure banking, medical services, education services and, of course, entertainment.  The costs for premium services and how they are going to be bundled into packages are still in question.

The ideas laid out in the proposal appear to be problematic according to the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) and “threaten to completely undermine the stated goal of neutrality.”  The EFF has further broken down what they believe are some of the issues with the proposed ideas in the Google and Verizon net neutrality agreement.  The proposal is available for review on both Google’s and Verizon’s public policy blogs.

Federal Court Rejects Viacom’s $1 Billion Lawsuit Against YouTube

Thursday, June 24th, 2010

Viacom, one of the world’s most widely known media giants, recently attempted to file a $1 billion copyright infringement lawsuit against YouTube only to get rejected by the U.S. Federal Court.  Viacom, like many other similar companies including Disney, NBC Universal and Time Warner, are trying hard to prevent TV clips and movies from being available on the Internet for free.

Louis Stanton, a district court judge, said that YouTube cannot be held responsible for individuals who post videos from popular productions, including Viacom, without getting approval from YouTube itself.

Viacom’s argument was that YouTube makes it “easy” for users to post video clips and difficult for copyright owners to monitor those clips that get posted without approval.  Judge Stanton simply rejected this argument based on the fact that the Digital Millennium Copyright Act eliminates the responsibility for websites of having to check user-generated content before it gets posted on the site.

YouTube has a reputation of removing clips that in violation of copyright laws immediately after they are posted, a fact confirmed by the judge.  Two years ago, YouTube actually removed 100,000 videos that violated Viacom copyright laws.

Viacom agreed to appeal the ruling in that it goes against the Digital Millennium Copyright Act as well as the views of Congress and the Supreme Court.  According to the ruling, individuals post 24 hours’ worth of video every minute to YouTube.  For Google, this ruling was an important win considering the number of people who turn to the Internet for information, content and communication.

Google the Gaffe Engine

Thursday, June 10th, 2010

Forced backgrounds? Really?

Google has been making some uncharacteristic mistakes that are driving users away.

The first blunder was last month when the Google logo was turned into a playable PacMan game. You might think this was not a bad idea at all, and it wasn’t—it was a wonderful surprise. The problem was that someone forgot to put an off button for the sound, and the game automatically would start (with sound) if a user loaded the Google home page, but didn’t navigate away (e.g. doing a search or logging into an account). They ended up correcting this problem later during the day, but the damage was done.

The second gaffe which went in effect yesterday was the forced background image for the Google home page. Initially it was an option, and was a welcome change; however, Google has decided that it’s better to force the picture on its visitors. What’s worse, there is no option to remove it, unless you are logged into your Google Account. Understandably, though apparently not to the decision-makers at Google, this forced change is at best irritating.

Hopefully Google will fix this problem soon, before it loses even more users to Bing.

For those of you who missed the PacMan logo, Google has kept it around: http://www.google.com/pacman/