Internet Marketing, Search Engine Optimization, and Technology Blog

Home
Blog Home
 Evoba.com
Main Website
 About
About the Blog

Posts Tagged ‘Google’

Privacy Battle Between Google and Spain Turned to European Court of Justice

Tuesday, March 1st, 2011

Earlier this year, Spain’s data protection authority (DPA) had asked Google to remove nearly one-hundred articles from search results. The articles threatened the privacy of the subjects mentioned and complaints were generated.

In the name of freedom of expression, Google has been determined to fight against Spain’s orders. Now, the case has been turned to the European court of justice, “which will offer guidance on whether Spain’s demands comply with European law – potentially setting a controversial precedent for Internet publishing in the country.” (The Guardian).

The high courts will need to decide if Google should remove the links to the articles in popular newspapers such as El País. Google believes that the publishers of the articles should be questioned rather than the search engine itself. However, Spanish authorities believe that the only way to keep the public from accessing private material is to rule against major search engines. The final outcome in this race for freedom of expression has yet to be determined.

Google Introduces Place Search

Thursday, October 28th, 2010

Yesterday, Google introduced “Place Search” as part of their dedication to improving relevant results for local search.  Place Search organizes search results around specific locations so that users can get all the information they need and compare places more easily.

According to Google, the new Place Search will be “dynamically connecting hundreds of millions of websites with more than 50 million real-world locations. [Google will] automatically identify when sites are talking about physical places and cluster links even when they don’t provide addresses and use different names.”

One of the major changes is the way the results page looks: only local results take up the page, the map has moved to the right, there are reviews of places along with images and relevant third party sites are clustered with the listings. Google will automatically provide results for obvious queries, but a new “Places” mode is available if Google does not know when users want local information.

Now that Place Search provides only local businesses on the first page, this makes it harder for third party publishers to be on the first page unless they are featured in the clusters that appear with each listing.  Those businesses that depend on organic listings may need to make some important changes in order to be fully optimized for Google’s Place Search.

Source: http://googleblog.blogspot.com/2010/10/place-search-faster-easier-way-to-find.html

Google Putting Together Its Team for Upcoming Social Network

Friday, August 27th, 2010

A couple months ago, it was revealed that Google will actually be launching a new social network of its own.  Now, the search engine giant is moving forward with the plan by buying out Angstro and hiring the founder of the company, Rohit Khare, to help build Google Me.  What made Khare the perfect candidate for Google?

For starters, he has been a leader in building several relevant social network features and products that will be of great use for Google.  According to the LA Times, “his vision for an ‘open, interoperable social networks,’ [makes] Khare a good fit for Google, which has championed that approach over Facebook’s ‘walled garden.’”

A message posted on the home page of Angstro by Khare late this week confirmed his transition to Google.  Angstro is a company that builds services that help Internet users get the right information on their friends and other contacts.  The stories these users get are directly related to their own friends, rather than strangers with the same name.  Although the plans for Google Me are still being developed behind closed doors, we can get a sense of what initially attracted Google to Khare.

What Khare will be doing while sitting next to Max Levchin from Slide is still in question, but it won’t be long until the public can finally participate in the next social network that Khare has helped build.  The focus, however, appears to be on a more open platform for communication.  It is also clear that Facebook is in for a major battle and will soon compete for the spot for the most popular social network on the web.

Is the Google and Verizon Net Neutrality Agreement All That Neutral?

Friday, August 13th, 2010

Google and Verizon have finally revealed a proposal that, according to Google, will defend net neutrality while also allowing a broadband network of premium services.  Net neutrality is the idea that Internet providers, like Verizon, should not be able to restrict traffic on the web based on the traffic’s content.  The proposal can ultimately change what open Internet is all about, despite Google’s aim for protecting users.

For one, the proposal will allow wireless networks to be exempt from the net neutrality regulation.  They can maintain their own private Internet and allow companies to pay for faster traffic. Second, according to PC World, the proposal “would also create a two-tiered Internet with a net neutral public Internet (the World Wide Web we use today), and a private non-neutral Internet for premium services.”  Many are questioning what will happen to regular Internet as we now know it considering the exemptions.

Opponents of the agreement say that net neutrality will not hold up as long as wireless networks are involved.  Google defends its case with an argument that open Internet for the public is not going to change.  The Federal Communications Commission (FCC) will have the authority to enforce neutrality and intervene when service providers fail to comply with nondiscrimination rules, including any attempts to reduce broadband capacity.  These nondiscirimination rules, however, have yet to be determined.

What you can get with premium services is going to be different than content available on regular Internet.  This includes gaming channels, secure banking, medical services, education services and, of course, entertainment.  The costs for premium services and how they are going to be bundled into packages are still in question.

The ideas laid out in the proposal appear to be problematic according to the Electronic Frontier Foundation (EFF) and “threaten to completely undermine the stated goal of neutrality.”  The EFF has further broken down what they believe are some of the issues with the proposed ideas in the Google and Verizon net neutrality agreement.  The proposal is available for review on both Google’s and Verizon’s public policy blogs.

Rumors On ‘Google Me’ Ring True

Tuesday, June 29th, 2010

A recent rumor that simply started as a tweet from Kevin Rose, co-founder of Digg, has it that Google is developing a social networking site called Google Me.  The speculations circling Google Me are actually true and that means that Facebook is in for a scare as Google Me will be the ultimate rival.

According to CNET, “former Facebook executive and Quora founder Adam D’Angelo took things a little further by declaring on Quora that ‘this is not a rumor. This is a real project. There are a large number of people working on it. I am completely confident about this.’”

Kevin Rose’s exact tweet from late Saturday night read: “Huge rumor: Google to launch Facebook competitor very soon “Google Me,” very credible source.”  Kevin Rose has a reputation of spilling the latest technology gossip and he seems to be right again.

What Google Me could be exactly is still unclear, but some say that it is an extension of Google Profiles, which is basically a representation of the user.  Others are saying that the prospective social network in question could combine Facebook’s news feed with Google Profile, status updates, pictures, etc.

What is interesting is that Google hasn’t been investing a lot of its time into social media.  Google Buzz was one recent attempt, but that did not catch on to the general public and proved to have major privacy issues as well.  Although Google fixed these issues, Buzz has not been all that popular.

Unlike Google Buzz, Google Me would probably have improved privacy controls and all new features.  According to Infosyncworld, Google Me could potentially appear on cell phones, including Google’s Android OS.  It shouldn’t be too long before we see the development of Google Me really take a leap.

China Asks Google To Stop Redirecting China Users to Hong Kong Search Engine

Tuesday, June 29th, 2010

Recently, Google has been redirecting mainland Chinese users to the Hong Kong search engine to allow access to unfiltered search.  The Chinese government, however, is no longer accepting the redirect and has asked Google to put an end to it all. Should Google refuse, China will not renew the Internet Content Provider license and that means Google must shut down Google.cn for good.

To tackle this problem, Google is planning to redirect a small percentage of mainland China users to a landing page on Google.cn which will link to Google.com.hk.

According to Google, “this approach ensures we stay true to our commitment not to censor our results on Google.cn and gives users access to all of our services from one page…As a company we aspire to make information available to users everywhere, including China. It’s why we have worked so hard to keep Google.cn alive, as well as to continue our research and development work in China.”

The Chinese government has yet to speak out about the new strategy and if they do not like the idea, it may be the end of Google in China.  Currently, mainland Chinese users can only search for certain topics, but cannot access the websites that come up on results pages.  Google continues to stand behind its commitment to making information available to everyone, but China’s push towards censorship is continuing to present challenges for Google.

Federal Court Rejects Viacom’s $1 Billion Lawsuit Against YouTube

Thursday, June 24th, 2010

Viacom, one of the world’s most widely known media giants, recently attempted to file a $1 billion copyright infringement lawsuit against YouTube only to get rejected by the U.S. Federal Court.  Viacom, like many other similar companies including Disney, NBC Universal and Time Warner, are trying hard to prevent TV clips and movies from being available on the Internet for free.

Louis Stanton, a district court judge, said that YouTube cannot be held responsible for individuals who post videos from popular productions, including Viacom, without getting approval from YouTube itself.

Viacom’s argument was that YouTube makes it “easy” for users to post video clips and difficult for copyright owners to monitor those clips that get posted without approval.  Judge Stanton simply rejected this argument based on the fact that the Digital Millennium Copyright Act eliminates the responsibility for websites of having to check user-generated content before it gets posted on the site.

YouTube has a reputation of removing clips that in violation of copyright laws immediately after they are posted, a fact confirmed by the judge.  Two years ago, YouTube actually removed 100,000 videos that violated Viacom copyright laws.

Viacom agreed to appeal the ruling in that it goes against the Digital Millennium Copyright Act as well as the views of Congress and the Supreme Court.  According to the ruling, individuals post 24 hours’ worth of video every minute to YouTube.  For Google, this ruling was an important win considering the number of people who turn to the Internet for information, content and communication.

Google the Gaffe Engine

Thursday, June 10th, 2010

Forced backgrounds? Really?

Google has been making some uncharacteristic mistakes that are driving users away.

The first blunder was last month when the Google logo was turned into a playable PacMan game. You might think this was not a bad idea at all, and it wasn’t—it was a wonderful surprise. The problem was that someone forgot to put an off button for the sound, and the game automatically would start (with sound) if a user loaded the Google home page, but didn’t navigate away (e.g. doing a search or logging into an account). They ended up correcting this problem later during the day, but the damage was done.

The second gaffe which went in effect yesterday was the forced background image for the Google home page. Initially it was an option, and was a welcome change; however, Google has decided that it’s better to force the picture on its visitors. What’s worse, there is no option to remove it, unless you are logged into your Google Account. Understandably, though apparently not to the decision-makers at Google, this forced change is at best irritating.

Hopefully Google will fix this problem soon, before it loses even more users to Bing.

For those of you who missed the PacMan logo, Google has kept it around: http://www.google.com/pacman/

Google’s Most Significant Addition to the Webmaster Tools

Friday, April 16th, 2010

Google

A couple of days ago Google quietly added a new feature to the Webmaster Tools Dashboard. It is actually an improvement to an existing feature, the Top Search Queries table.

Previously, the Top Search Queries table listed keywords, and the average position in which the keyword appeared over a given period of time (selectable through a dropdown menu). With these new changes, there is now a wealth of information about those keywords:

- Impressions: The number of times your site appeared on a search page when a particular keyword search was conducted.
- Click-through: The click-through rate (CTR) for the keyword listed in the table.
- Position: The position in which a keyword appeared in the results. Note: if the result was beyond the first page listing, only the page number appears.
- Pages: The page which ranked for a particular keyword.

This is truly an amazing amount of information that Google had decided to provide through the Webmaster Tools. Not only does this provide useful information as to rankings and the activity happening on the search engine result pages (SERPs), it also gives some insight into how the Google algorithm works.

Google Tries to Help Those Contemplating Suicide

Monday, April 5th, 2010

Someone is watching

In an interesting addition to its search results, Google has introduced a new addition to queries which may indicate that someone is considering committing suicide. The new feature ads an entry at the top of the search results which provides information the 800 number for the US National Suicide Prevention Lifeline.

It’s times like this makes people realize what an important role technology plays in their lives, and how a little ingenuity can impact fragile lives in a deep and profound way.

There is a good Karma point in this for Google.